So this is what was said at the water libation ceremony during Sukkot. My comment will be at the end.
“At the ceremony Rabbi Azriel Ariel announced the birth of the red heifer. “This is the beginning of a long process that will, God willing, allow us to purify all of Israel, Rabbi Ariel said. “This is not us forcing God’s hand. We are simply performing mitzvoth (Torah commandments) as given to us in the Torah.”
So in my book I documented over and over where the Jews claim that the red heifer needs to be 3 years old before it can be sacrificed. Well, now Rabbi Azriel Ariel says that the heifer can be sacrificed at just 2 years old. They all of the sudden pushed it up a year. They are forcing this heifer sacrifice to happen as fast as possible and they may just understand the timing of all of this. According to this rabbi he claims, “This is not us forcing God’s hand.” Well that’s because they are trying to play god with their genetically modified red heifer that has the DNA of who knows what (Serapis bull..cough cough). Read my book and you’ll get it.
Anyways, the time for a sacrifical age has now moved up a year. Why is this so significant in my eyes? Well 2 years from September 2018 puts us at September 2020 and the feast of Tabernacles. I suspect that if they didn’t try to burn it on the Mount of Olives then, they will wait until Hannakah season and the feast of lights in December. Why? Because for 3 days through December 20-22 we will witness the rare ha dibbuq ha gadol otherwise known as the great cleaving or conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter. My whole theory in my book is based on this conjunction in December at the winter solstice and the red heifer sacrifice. And it actually may just happen this way. If this is so, I wonder if the rabbis want to read my book to see what my theory has to offer them. It’s definetly not good.
Side note: Azriel means help of god and is the name of the angel of death in different cultures. Ariel means lion of god. Pope Alexander claims ariel was a sprite, a water demon.
I wrote this 3 year’s ago today, before my book was finished.
What is “The Temple, The Abomination and The Holy Place”?
If you were to ask the same question to people who watches, studies or is interested in Bible Prophecy in these last days, you will find out real fast how much the majority of them all agree. The majority will tell you that the Jews will rebuild a 3rd temple, the antichrist will set himself up in this temple and claim that he is God, and he will then set up some sort of abomination in the holy place that causes Jerusalem to become desolate. I have read this a thousand times in books that say the same thing but have different covers and titles. I have watched video after video that claims the exact same thing as the video before it. And every last one of them will claim that this is the gospel truth.
But, the real question is this? Is it all true? What if one thing concerning these events wasn’t true? Would this allow their whole house of cards to crumble to the ground? What would these so called prophecy experts do if the very bedrock of their teachings ended up like the house that was built on sand? Can we be sure to trust what someone else tells us without testing it with what the Bible says?
This entire teaching of what I mentioned above is loosely based off of Daniel 9:27. I believe this one verse is crucial for knowing how you are going to look at and understand Bible prophecy in this day and age. They take the “he” mentioned in this particular verse and say that it is the antichrist and this is where they get the 7 year tribulation. But….what if the “he” mentioned isn’t the antichrist (and I’m using the term antichrist in place of man of sin or son of perdition because this is the term that has been used in this teaching. Even though the name antichrist isn’t actually ever mentioned in the Bible referring to a particular man, it is used in 1st and 2nd John when representing the spirit that denies that Jesus came in the flesh, denies that He is the Messiah and denies the Father and the Son). What if the “he” referenced back to the One who Chapter 9 was talking about the whole time? The Messiah or the Anointed One to come. No where in this verse alone or the entire Chapter for that matter, does it ever once refer to the antichrist. It would be more obvious to refer the “he” to “the people of the prince”. This would be Titus according to what the Preterist says. But that just isn’t true. So if this “he” is Jesus, then this verse alone changes everything according to modern Bible prophecy.
Then what happens? You no longer have a 7 year tribulation where everyone argues about the timing of the “rapture”. Instead of trying to figure out the foundation to something prophetic, everyone wants to instead fight about something that has no real basis to it. To understand not only the prophetic aspect of scripture for the future, you need to know the historical background to rightly divide it all. What if the disciples knew what Jesus was speaking about when He said what He said in Matthew 24:15? What did it mean when the writers of the Gospel said “whoso readeth, let him understand:”, when Jesus mentioned Daniels abomination? Was He referring to all three abominations mentioned or referencing to one particular abomination? How would it change your outlook on the end times?
Can we be for sure that this 3rd temple will be built? I’m 99% sure this Jewish temple will be rebuilt but that’s not according to scripture. This will only happen because mans heart is continuously wicked. Wasn’t Jesus as our perfect sacrifice good enough or do we still need the blood of bulls and goats? Does Paul refer to an actual temple of God in Thessalonians or did he and in fact Jesus, mention something else about this temple? Was the glory of God ever in the temple in the time of Jesus and what does the historical record say about the inside of the Holy of Holies? If God was going to actually have a temple again (which He never would), wouldn’t it have to be in the exact same location as the first two and not a centimeter off? These are questions that need to be asked.
And if there is no temple that God would ever recognize in this day and age, where is this Holy Place actually at? It cant possibly be in the Holy of Holies can it? Wouldn’t the Ark of the Covenant need to be in its exact same spot to even make it Holy again? Does the Bible ever speak about another Holy location that God recognized as HOLY? And what about this abomination. There is so much speculation on what it may or may not be, does the Bible give us any hints? I am not going to claim that I have all of the answers, but I do believe the Word of God will show us things if we allow to get our own understanding out of the way.
If you are going to read my book “The Temple, Abomination and The Holy Place”, you need to drop every preconceived idea you had about Bible prophecy concerning these topics and look into these matters yourself. I’m not expecting anyone to take my word for it with what I’m saying. I do expect you to research it for yourselves, search the scriptures diligently and come to your own conclusion on what the Scriptures are saying. What do I personally expect from someone reading this book? I personally expect to be called names and be told that I’m in error by the profit prophets of today. As someone once told me recently, I’m sure the piranhas will love having their way with me. If that’s the worst to happen to me, I’m ok with that. I won’t be the one back peddling and having to recall hundreds of books, videos and teachings.
So with that said….
There are new people on this blog now so I’ll go ahead and repost this from last year. I do want to say that I’m thankful for anyone who has either purchased the books or downloaded them from my Google Drive. So here ya go…
I am going to offer my three books for free on pdf. Unlike a lot of people, I don’t ever charge for anything I write. You don’t have to sign up and be a “premium” member to read my articles. The only thing you need to do is be on this Facebook page and/or go to my blog (www.hiddeninthecrag.com). You don’t even need to join WordPress to read my blog. Writing takes a lot of my time and I am still able to do this working 40 hours a week and being with my family.
I haven’t sold many books due to the fact that “I’m a nobody” and the self publishing (Creatspace) I have used puts the price on my books. This is due to size and printing materials. My first book which is over 800 pages long took me 2 years to write and because of its size, Amazon makes me charge $24. After all costs for publishing are done I barely make $5. The second book is different because its smaller and I get about $3 per book. The 3rd book is the same size as the first. Trust me, I couldn’t make a living off of book sales but with that said, I am very thankful for those who have supported my writing and bought the books. I know times are hard for people but at this point I just want people to read my research and glean what they can from it.
I guess I am saying all of this because I want people to know that I do what I do because I love writing, and researching with the gift of discernment is my calling. I am very appreciative when someone thanks me for something I was researching. And believe it or not, I’m thankful when someone disagrees with me because they actually took the time out of their schedule to read what I wrote. So I am letting whoever wants to, download my books for free.
There is symbolism in EVERYTHING. 99% of the stuff I write about, I could never personally make up. I’m not that smart. But it doesn’t take a smart person to see through what these occultists are showing and telling us. It only takes some discernment from Jesus Christ.
Today Cassini dove into Saturn and became “one” with the lord of the rings. Saturn represents Cronos ie Time. I posted a few days ago about the new movie Geostorm and how its connected to Cronos as far as time is running out. I think its safe to say that when you see man made storms like the ones shown in the movie, and hurricanes like Harvey and Irma (with more on the horizon) in our present day, time may be running out. But this is just the beginning of sorrows (birth pains).
In the trailer for this movie a song by The Chambers Brothers called Time Has Come is playing. Here is the lyrical video and keep in mind time is running out while reading the lyrics. Is this movie along with thousands of others telegraphing there punches once again?
Now the interesting thing about Cassini diving into Saturn is the symbolism with time running out. When I watched the video of the Cassini cult waiting for their last transmission from Cassini to cut out, it was a little strange. They were acting like Saturn was no longer going to be around based on Cassini not being there anymore. I saw it as their beloved Cronos was dying or there time had run out to see their dying god.
Another interesting fact about time running out was the clock Big Ben in London was shutting down on August 21st until 2021. If you remember, this was the eclipse in the United States. So we can see symbolically with Big Ben and with Cassini/Saturn, time is running out. Let me also bring up TIME Magazine’s cover and story for September 25th, 2017. It’s called Irma’s Angels. Time running out. Storms getting bigger. Beginning of birth pains. While all along, man revolts against God ny saying “The storms keep getting stronger. AND SO DO WE.” Even Time magazine is declaring this.
But who gets the torch of Orion? Didn’t Saturn/Cronos have a son? Sure did. His name was Jupiter/Zeus otherwise known as Jupiter Serapis. As one “god” dies, the other comes alive. The false father and son at it again.
Goro says this in his article about the movie 2010: The Year We Make Contact. “A swarm of Monoliths plunge into Jupiter, triggering a nuclear chain reaction and turning the planet into a second sun called “Lucifer” (in the novel version). In early drafts the planet was actually Saturn. It was only after the special effects team was unable to produce a convincing rendition of Saturn’s rings that they picked Jupiter as the destination in 2001: A Space Odyssey and subsequently in 2010: The Year We Make Contact. The name “Lucifer” ties into the so-called “Lucifer Project“, a fairly popular conspiracy theory that claims NASA’s Galileo mission – plunging into Jupiter on September 21, 2003 – was secretly intended to ignite the gas giant with its nuclear fuel. That of course did not materialize. Not to be deterred, the same idea was applied to Cassini and Saturn, what’s unfolding right now.”
Notice that he said it was originally supposed to be Saturn represented in 2010. Now I don’t know if that was just a front for Stanley Kubrick or what, but you know good and well he was an occultist. His full intention was to have Jupiter represented as the second Sun not Saturn. Even a low level wikipedia occultist could’ve figured that one out. It was symbology at its greatest. The Sun would be birthed but it would be the 2nd sun, not the original Sun/ Son. This even goes into demonic doctrine that Jesus and Lucifer were spiritual brothers ala Mormon theology.
Now the Monoliths triggered the birthing of Jupiter by being “plunged” into the planet. This is reminiscent of what happened today (9/15/17) with Cassini carrying 72.3 pounds of plutonium 238. We will look at this plutonium in a second. Notice how these monoliths were used for portals and gateways (my assumption) on earth that were directly connected to Jupiter the second Sun (son). They looked like a flattened version of Saturns black cube.
And Ridley Scott will be doing an upcoming Syfi t.v. series called 3001: The Final Odyssey sometime this year.
Now back to the plutonium. Most don’t know but scientists did oppose NASA to putting 72 pounds of plutonium in space. You can read admit it here and here. The first article actually mentions that this plutonium had already crashed into Saturn in April. I mentioned this before because it happened near Passover and I find it odd that they were sending it to Saturn twice. Once at Passover and then now on 9/15/17.
So what is really going on here with Cassini plunging into Saturn twice? And why would NASA need to bury 72 pounds of plutonium into Saturn? Plutonium 238 is is 280 times more radioactive than plutonium 239 that is used in nuclear reactors. It would kill everyone on this planet if it fell back to earth. And do you remember the nuclear power plants that were in Irma’s way that they were worried about?
This video covers a news conference held in 1997 at the National Press Club in Washington opposing the launch of the Cassini space probe and was covered on C-Span.
This word in Greek is used in Revelation 18:17 for the riches that have been made desolate in relation to Mystery Babylon. The word means rich and oddly enough they were using the name plutonium for the metal barium. If you understand Chemtrails then you know how barium is used in them to spray us. Strange they used to call plutonium barium right?
One last thing, Saturn was the sower. He planted his seeds to reap his return. There was a festival in honor of this sowing called Consualia. I mention the connection to the August 21st eclipse here. Now there seems to be some connection indirectly to Cassini’s plutonium being sown into Saturn. In mythology Pluto was also known as Hades the god of the underworld and was the brother of Zeus/Jupiter. Pluto means wealth as in mineral wealth that was underground. Pluto ruled below the earth that produced the harvest that was below ground. Here is an interesting article about mining for plutonium on asteroids.
So what was this symbolic death of Cassini plungong into Saturn all about? Maybe it was about the harvest that’s to come. The tares.
Some sects of the 923 cult believes that Jupiter is born today (9/9/17). And by Jupiter they mean the church who will be raptured today by 4 am Central time. I’m not even joking. You see, Stanley Kubrick wasn’t an idiot when he made the movies 2001 and 2010. He was 7 years early for a reason. The baby in the 2010 poster is a reborn or born again David Bowman. He becomes a Star Child that was “born again” because of Jupiter. David means beloved and was a King. Bowman means archer and the archer is symbolised through Nimrod the Mighty Hunter. David Bowman is repesented as Nimrod/Osiris who died and then was resurrected as a Star Child Tammuz/Horus with the help of Jupiter and its stargates.
Let me say it again. He became a Star Child that was “born again” because of Jupiter. Scottie Clarke has a false teaching that claims you are born again at the rapture and the church as a whole is represented as the man-child of Rev 12 which is Jupiter. According to some (and him?), the church is born today (or depending on who you ask maybe the 23rd). Doesn’t Clarke’s false teaching sound a lot like Kubricks 2010? If you need to read his convoluted false teaching for yourself, I posted it in full from his Facebook page. Feel free to message him on FB but beware, he won’t debate you because he claims that specifically goes against Scripture. He must’ve missed the part about not teaching false doctrine. Here is his false doctrine. Enjoy.
The church was NOT “born” at Pentecost. The cart has been before the horse. In researching the true meaning of the Revelation 12 sign, I discovered some major semantics errors in Christian doctrines that once rightly divided and corrected have put all the pieces together. Conception and gestation precede birth. We do not see these before Pentecost in Acts 2.
The church was CONCEIVED at Pentecost. The church age is our gestation period. The rapture is our birth when we will be born again. The term, “born again” interpreted as individual salvation is also incorrect. Salvation is salvation. “Born again” is a promise and the future result of salvation.
The Holy Spirit conceived Yahshua within Mary (Matt. 1:18). He is our Headship (Col. 1:18). The Holy Spirit conceived a new creation, the Body (church) in Jerusalem. We were all born of flesh and water and into sin, but we must be born of the Spirit, born from above (John 3:3) to enter Heaven (John 3:5-6)
Born of water is the earthly man. Born of Spirit is a new creation, the Heavenly man. We are a new creation (2 Cor. 5:17), as is a baby before it leaves the womb. Life begins at conception, not birth. Born again, born from above – is only for those who have been conceived from above as Yahshua was.
The Head was conceived from above, the Body was conceived from above. But no believer has been born again in real time … YET. Just because someone may “feel” they had a “born again experience” does not equate to an actual birth. These are simply emotions to which false semantics have been applied.
The moment of salvation is corrected to be a personal Holy Spirit CONCEPTION, when a person is also incorporated into the Body of all believers, the Body of Yahshua. After personal salvation (conception) when the Holy Spirit enters an individual, one begins their personal spiritual growth (gestation) along with the corporate Body already in effect. The finale of the gestation is the changing from corruptible to incorruptible at the new birth (1 Cor. 15:52; 2 Peter 1:23).
“Born again” is a future prophecy just like Eph. 2:6 which states that we are seated in heaven with Messiah, which of course we are not. We are still on earth. These may be stated in what seems to be present terms, but they are not. They are future. They are promises. There are numerous scriptures written this way. Similarly, if one buys tickets online to a sports event, the individual may say he “has” tickets, but in reality the tickets are waiting for him at the gate. He only need show proof of identification to receive them at his arrival on game day. His email receipt is a legal promise. The Holy Spirit is YOUR legal promise.
All this said, I must make an important point. This can be a tricky subject because of a perspective distinction. We are discussing here from the perspective of earth time, real time – the timeline of the church. From Elohim’s perspective, who sees the end from the beginning, we are already born into heaven and seated with Messiah on the throne. From our perspective, in real time – we are not there yet. The rapture is our second birth when our gestation is complete and we are born into heaven after being changed so that we are able to be received there.
The bottom line: Major prophetic events happen on the feast days. They are Appointments of Yahshua which He will personally fulfill.
Conception – Pentecost (Acts 2:3-4)
Gestation – Church Age
Birth – Trumpets (Rev. 12:5)
This is what the Revelation 12 sign seems to be telling us. It is on the Feast of Trumpets in 2017 and we seem to be at the end of the church age! When I questioned all of this and rightly divided it, the timeline of the church was revealed as to who we are – a child ready to be born. These “cart before the horse” semantics have been a stumbling block to the church, who never understood the true language of these verses or the great birth story.
What is “born again”? Salvation via belief? It never made any sense the way it was taught to us because they taught it backwards. The truth might blow your mind because it is so obvious once you see it. I just received a question under my latest video about this topic and thought I would share my answer. This may rub you wrong for a minute but keep reading. I believe I can show you how this “born again” idea has been totally misunderstood. Enjoy!
Question: It would seem that these two verses below contradict what you are saying. Are you saying that the believer is currently NOT born again? What do these verses proclaim?
1 John 5:1 Whoever believes that Jesus is the Christ is born of God, and whoever loves the Father loves the child born of Him.
1 John 5:4-5 For whoever is born of God overcomes the world; and this is the victory that has overcome the world. Who is the one who overcomes the world, but he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God?
Answer: Firstly, being born again (a second time) is not some mystical, exclusively spiritual experience as we have been led to believe. It is both spiritual AND physical – being changed from mortal to immortal.
A birth cannot take place solely spiritually. It always takes place with a spirit within a body. A body without a spirit is a dead body. And a spirit without a body cannot be born. This works for both a first and a second birth. Messiah said that unless one is born of both water (first birth) AND Spirit (second birth) he is unable to enter the reign of Elohim (John 3:5). These are two distinct births. The first is a natural human birth on earth, and at the second birth one immediately enters into the reign of Elohim – also seen in Rev. 12:5.
Human adults consist of about 60% water. A newborn human baby consists of about 75% water. When a mother gives birth, her “water breaks”. This is the first birth deriving from a sperm and an egg of water, or the flesh. Corrupted flesh. The second birth is of The Spirit. This birth is exclusively for a person fertilized and birthed first by water, but then also fertilized secondarily by The Father’s Spirit, which is from above, the Seed Incorruptible.
So merely believing is not the second birth. The second birth is the rapture, which is not of corruptible seed, but of Incorruptible Seed (1 Peter 1:23) as Paul said we must be changed from this corrupted state to an incorrupted state. (1 Cor. 15:50-53). As of now, the second birth is future expectation. It is an inheritance incorruptible, undefiled and unfading, which is kept in heaven for us until our deliverance to be revealed in the last days (1 Peter 1:3-5).
Once the second birth takes place, the then incorruptible believer is totally unable to sin.
1 John 3:9 (post rapture) Everyone who has been born of God does not sin, because His seed remains in him; he is not able to sin, because he has been born of God.
This is certainly not the case while we reside within corrupted flesh (first birth).
1 John 1:8 If we say, “We have no sin,” we are deceiving ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
The “victory” in 1 John 5:4-5 is the victory over death, the resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:54). Just as Christ had that same victory on First Fruits. This victory over death and the world can only occur for an individual by possessing belief before the church age ends at the rapture. Thinking in terms of a natural birth which begins with a sperm entering an egg, salvation is likened to a person (an empty egg) being fertilized by Incorruptible Seed (the Holy Spirit) at which point a person begins their spiritual growth (gestation). The end result is birth, the rapture. The birth does not occur at the beginning of the process. Birth is the end, an exit. Fertilization is the beginning, an entry. Just like the natural system, a woman’s egg is worthless and doomed to destruction each month. It is flushed out with blood if it is not fertilized with a sperm. But once fertilized, it becomes of great value and grows until birth.
In like manner, every human is a mortal, worthless, empty egg doomed to destruction without the fertilization by Incorruptible Seed. But once fertilized, the human becomes of great value and grows until its second birth which is a birth into immortality and an incorruptible nature. This has been taught completely backwards because Revelation 12:5 was misunderstood. Also, certain English translations make future promises seem like they are things we currently have such as being seated with Christ in heaven (Eph. 2:6) which is worded like it is currently true but it is clearly another post rapture prophecy.
We are not seated in Heaven, I am at my desk writing, and you are somewhere reading. These types of promises can be described as, “we have it, but not yet”. We have it now only as a promise, an expectation. When we buy something online, we legally own the item because it has been payed for and we get an email receipt. But do we immediately HAVE the item? No. We have to wait for the day of its delivery. We “have” it, but not yet.
This is how the “born again” promise works. The Holy Spirit is our receipt which we have received via belief that our second birth into incorruptible flesh has been payed for at the cross. So no. No one has been born again … yet. But the promise has been payed for. We have the receipt. We expect it to come and presently we are simply tracking the package until deliverance day 😉
This series of enhanced-color images shows Jupiter up close and personal, as NASA’s Juno spacecraft performed its eighth flyby of the gas giant planet. The images were obtained by JunoCam. From left to right, the sequence of images taken on Sept. 1, 2017 from 3:03 p.m. to 3:11 p.m. PDT (6:03 p.m. to 6:11 p.m. EDT). At the times the images were taken, the spacecraft ranged from 7,545 to 14,234 miles (12,143 to 22,908 kilometers) from the tops of the clouds of the planet at a latitude range of -28.5406 to -44.4912 degrees.
Someone on my page I Don’t Care If Anyone Reads This brought up a few interesting thoughts about these hurricanes hitting the United States. He (Larson Messenger) first mentioned the Orions belt connection to the three hurricanes Irma, Katia and Jose. The placement of these hurricanes is reminiscent of orions belt. He then brought up the Osiris triad mythos. It made me think about the connection with the names Osiris (Harvey), Isis (Irma) and Horus (Jose or Joseph in English). Here is his comment. “My first thought on hearing about the three hurricanes was that they were Orion’s Belt, or the family of Osiris, Isis, and Horus. But now that I think about it these are probably representative of Mercury, Mars, and Venus”.
Let’s look at the Orions Belt conection first. Orion’s Belt or the Belt of Orion, also known as the Three Kings or Three Sisters. “The three belt stars were collectively known by many names in many cultures. Arabic terms include النجاد Al Nijād ‘the Belt’, النسك Al Nasak ‘the Line’, العلقات Al Alkāt ‘the Golden Grains or Nuts’ and, in modern Arabic, ميزان الحق Al Mīzān al Ḥaqq ‘the Accurate Scale Beam‘. In Chinese mythology they were known as The Weighing Beam…In pre-Christian Scandinavia, the belt was known as Frigg’s Distaff (Friggerock) or Freyja’s distaff. Similarly Jacob’s Staff and Peter’s Staff were European biblical derived terms, as were the Three Magi, or the Three Kings. Väinämöinen’s Scythe (Kalevala) and Kalevan Sword are terms from Finnish mythology.” (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alnitak)
What is interesting about Orions belt is that it means a weighing beam or accurate scale beam. In light of me saying that this is a form of judgement whether its from the hand of GOD or performed by man, its a form of judgement. So the Orions Belt seems to be an interesting fit especially with the placement of the hurricanes and where orions belt is in the sky. The next interesting connection here is the Three Kings or Three Magi reference. Obviously we know that this represents the magi that went to see Jesus after He was born. You can also see these three magi showing up again at the door step of America who has proclaimed this false September 23rd sign. Are they coming to proclaim their false king? Don’t forget about the pyramid connection to Orions Belt called the christ angle on September 21st that these people are waiting for.
When looking at the Osiris myth connection you can see the obvious with the father, mother and son. You have Osiris (Harvey), Isis (Irma) and Horus (Jose or Joseph in English). The one name that can indirectly be connected to this name game is Irma.
“The Category 5 hurricane bearing down on the Caribbean and Florida would have been called Irene just a few short years ago. Irma is the replacement name for Irene, which was officially retired in 2012 after the devastation the storm caused in Vermont and the region. There is a strict procedure established by the World Meteorological Organization for the naming of storms, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. For Atlantic hurricanes, there is a list of alternating male and female names which are used on a six-year rotation. In the event that more than 21 storms occur in a season, they switch to the Greek alphabet. Irma is currently on a path toward Puerto Rico, the Dominican Republic, Haiti and Cuba before possibly heading for Florida over the weekend.” (http://www.wcax.com/content/news/Irma-replaces-Irene-in-the-hurricane-lexicon-442872993.html) Irene was a goddess of spring who represents Isis. The other 2 connections are based on the father and son.
The last thing I want to look at is his Mercury, Mars and Venus connection to Katia, Irma and Jose. The placement of these two signs is uncanning. Here are the connections to these planets. Katia means virgin. The virgin constellation is Virgo who’s ruling planet is Mercury. Irma the goddess of war was married to Mars according to mythology. So Irma was the wife of Mars, the god of war. And finally you have Jose or Joseph in English. Read what Deuteronomy says about Joseph.
Deuteronomy 33:16 And for the precious things of the earth and fulness thereof, and for the good will of him that dwelt in the bush: let the blessing come upon the head of Joseph, and upon the top of the head of him that was separated from his brethren. 17 His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, and his horns are like the horns of unicorns: with them he shall push the people together to the ends of the earth: and they are the ten thousands of Ephraim, and they are the thousands of Manasseh.
This could be describing the constellation Taurus with its two horns of Ephraim and Manasseh. And according to astrology Taurus is ruled by Venus. So according to scripture, astrology and mythology there seems to be a conection with Katia and Mercury, Irma and Mars and Jose (Joseph) and Venus. Not only that, the placements of them is much like Orions belt. Who would’ve thought?
So just maybe this is the beginning of the scales of judgement from Orions Belt hitting the South of the United States? Maybe its the “three magi” proclaiming this false king to be born on September 9th? Are we seeing what is happening spiritually manifesting itself in the physical? We may just be. And its not looking good.
The main argument from the 9/23 Rapture Cult is that this sign from Revelation 12:1 is the rapture. Some have even back pedeled away from it and make the claim that if the rapture doesn’t happen on September 21-23 then it will happen by the first of October or by December 1st. Some have even said that it could be the start of their “7 year tribulation”. I disagree with all those theories. I’ll say it a million times, its not a good sign and its an occult event only to decieve Christians.
They look at all kinds of disinformation and will continue to disregard the actual Greek text and wording of scripture. One particular person who has commented on my original post continued to say prophetic literature was written in different tenses and moods in the Greek but refuses to explain what he means and answer my main point. That being…Why would John use one specific form of a word that was in the Passive (Past Tense as he saw it when writing it) form and use the same word in a different form in the following chapter as Active (something Future and continuing at the time he wrote it)? Let’s look at the Greek of these verses.
Below is from the Recieved Text or Textus Receptus of 1550. This stream of Greek is where we get the KJV. In contrast to this text is the Tischendorf 8th Edition where he translated from the Sinaiticus. Tish found this text in the trash at a Greek Monastery. Wescott and Hort and Nestle and Aland used this text along with many others to get modern translations like the NIV and many others.
In order for one to believe that the Revelation 12:1 & 3 signs are for a future event, one would need to stick to Tischendorfs Sinaiticus manuscript which falls right in line with the Vatican made “rapture” theory. Below we see verses Revelation 12:1 & 3 in regards to what John SAW or should I say was seen ie passive ie past tense. Underneath these verses is Tischendorfs falsified documents.
As you can see, John used ὤφθη ((ōphthē – was seen) as a Aorist Indicative Passive in the 3rd person in the Textus Receptus manuscripts. Matter of fact, almost every Greek text used this same word except for Tischendorfs 8th Edition from the Sinaiticus. He used ὁράω which is in the Indicative Active and is actually the root word horaó. The way he wrote it was in the Future tense and the Vatican Jesuits loved it. In all of the other manuscripts, including W&H’s blasphemous texts, it was passive. This is where these texts got it right for once.
Now if John wanted to use this word for something seen in a future or active tense for the Greek, he would’ve wrote the word in a active future tense or a future tense. The active future tense of this word for “seen or saw” looks like this, εἶδον (eidon). Ironically John did use the future active tense of this word in Revelation, and he used it 45 times. The active future form of this word εἶδον was used 45 times compared to ὤφθη, the passive or past tense form used only 3 times. Now I need to correct something on my last paper on this. According to the W&H, Nestle and other texts, this word εἶδον (eidon) is used in Revelation 13:1. Tischendorf still uses ὁράω. The problem with this is that these mentioned manuscripts completely leave out the opening sentence in 13:1.
And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy (KJV)
So these other manuscripts leave out a sentence all together and the word for saw, εἶδον (eidon) is used in the active future form. Something that would be present in John’s day that would continue into the future. That should put to sleep a future 1st and 2nd beast theory…but it won’t according to some.
The actual true Future tense of the word for this same word for “seen or saw” was used by John a few times in Revelation. You can see it in Revelation 1:7 the Future Indicative Middle tense of ὄψεται (opsetai). Its also in Revelation 22:4 with ὄψονται (opsontai). These two words are used for Jesus’ second coming for a future time. The Greek wasn’t foriegn to John when he wrote this word for something he saw in a dream or vision whether it be for a future time or something in the past. It was either past tense with something that happened prior to him seeing what he saw or it was something active while he was writing Revelation and continuing or for the a future event at the time of him writing Revelation.
All of these words come from the root word horaó. John clearly knew how to differentiate between something that happened in the past, something that was actively happening and would to continue to happen in the future and something that was strictly for a future time. According to the Greek text, Revelation 12:1,3 was based off of something that had happened in the past. If John wanted to say that the Revelation 12 signs were for a future event then he would have used either ὄψεται of Revelation 1:7 or ὄψονται in Revelation 22:4. He didn’t. That’s why Revelation 12:1 is the birth of Jesus and not some “rapture” of the Church. To believe its for a future time and the “rapture” of the church then you need to follow the corrupted Sinaiticus and the Vatican. Which they do.