A few thoughts on harpagēsometha and nilqah…the catching away

(These are just a few thoughts. I will keep revisiting this in the future.)

The Greek word that is used in 1st Thessalonians 4:17 for the catching away is ‘αρπαγησομεθα’, harpagēsometha. We all know this as the catching away but in some circles, people prefer the Latin term “rapture” over something that is Biblical. Harpazo is the root word that Strong’s gives you when looking at the numbering system. Most people don’t know but Strong’s just gives you the roots of words and there is nothing wrong with that. But in order to actually get to the “root” of the Greek or Hebrew word then you need to have a few more reliable resources available.

I thought I would look at the Hebrew translation of the New Testament to see what word they had used for this catching away. Now if we look at this same verse in Hebrew this is how it would look. It is read from right to left. “1Th 4:17 אחרי־כן אנחנו החיים הנותרים נלקח אתם יחדו בעננים לקראת האדון לאויר ובכן נהיה תמיד עם־האדון׃” This word in Hebrew is נִלְקָ֑ח nilqah (and is the Hebrew translation from the Greek word ‘αρπαγησομεθα’, harpagēsometha) and the root of this word in Hebrew is ‘lakad or laqach (transliteration)’. The spelling is נלקח but the root word is לקחH3947 which means “to take, lay hold of, receive, acquire, buy, marry, take a wife, snatch, take away”. 

So as you can see there is a wide range for what this word can actually mean. I do like that it means to marry or take a wife which brings us to what harpagēsometha really represents. The bridegroom coming for His bride on the last day and having to pluck her from the fire. Its not the “rapture” in a modern evangelical prophetic sense.

Obviously this word in a Greek translation means “snatch off or away or carry by force”. When looking it up in Strong’s take a look at definition “e. 2.” in light of the normal definitions. 

The Hebrew word nilqah can mean a flash of lightning. Now consider this. Some scholars believe that at the time of the Resurrection of Jesus, the glory of God that had rose Jesus from the dead was similiar to a flash of lightning. Do you get my point? This violent snatching away used in 1st Thessalonians 4:17 makes me think back to the Resurrection of Jesus (which by the way, the variation of the root word ‘harpazo’ – ἡρπάγη ērpagē is used in Revelation 12:5 and 2nd Corinthians 12:4). Now ‘ἡρπάγη’ ērpagē is very interesting in this context of Scriptures because Revelation refers to Jesus’ Resurrection and Corinthians refers to Paul being taken to the 3rd Heaven. Revelation 12:5 and Paul being taken to the 3rd Heaven are good examples of the catching away of those who are still alive at the time of Jesus’ second coming. This is the resurrection of the living and of those who sleep.

Now let’s get back to the Hebrew word נִלְקָ֑ח nilqah for a second. Here is what is interesting about the verse I found in the Old Testament with this same word ‘nilkákh or nilqah’ (נלקח). This word can be found in 1st Samuel 4:22 and is also found in 1st Samuel 4:11 and Ezekiel 33:6. When you go to 1st Samuel 4:21,22 it says this. “:the ark of God is taken (נלקח).” This is alluding to Phineas’ wife who was pregnant and near delivery when she heard that the ark of God was taken from Israel. This happened because of her father in law and husband. Now it’s also interesting because the way this word is used in three times in the Old Testament is in a negative connotation. 

When you look at Ezekiel 33:6 it is referencing the watchman that doesn’t sound the trumpet to warn others that the sword is coming and he will be taken away in his iniquity. So we have a watchman who is supposed to be watching for a calamity that will come upon the people. As he warns the people, this allows those people who have watched or have been watching for the wrong things to take notice. And if they have been watching in the wrong direction than this gives them time to repent. Those watchman who don’t sound the trumpet will be taken away in their iniquity.

All of this just made me think about this false birthing sign of this “rapture” that these people have been anticipating. I have been ridiculed for warning people and showing them in Scripture that this Revelation 12:1 sign in the heavens was in fact Jesus being born and was something that happened in the past. These people refuse to listen to what is being said and would rather mock someone than look honestly at Scripture. It is very reminiscent of a watchman sounding the trumpet of warning in Ezekiel (and I’m not claiming that I’m some Biblical watchman either). 

Ironically these 2 words (harpagēsometha and nilqah) are representing the same thing that is surrounded by the catching away of Jesus (resurrection) of Revelation 12:5, the resurrection of those who are alive (and those asleep) of 1st Thessalonians 4:17, a pregnant woman seeing the glory of God and the ark being taken away in 1st Samuel and Ezekiel 33:6’s watchman failing at what he is supposed to do…warn others. These people who really believe Rev. 12 is some future sign want to consider themselves watchman by their own admission and they are failing at telling Christians what is really going on. It is really frustrating to see this happening.

The Old Testament Hebrew translation of this word for a New Testament catching away is almost like the other side of this harpagēsometha coin. What will happen with those who have been proclaiming that Rev. 12 is the future sign of the church being “raptured” when that is further from the truth. The “rapture” isn’t a secret event like they have taught over all these years. And it isn’t going to happen on September 23rd like they are teaching now. But I do suspect that something very bad will come out of this whole thing. The trumpet has been blown and those reject it will suffer repercussions. And check this out, if Paul wanted to use a word that was meaning something was “taken in secret” then he would’ve used the word ‘klepto’. But he didn’t. He used harpagēsometha. Our bodily resurrection.

3 thoughts on “A few thoughts on harpagēsometha and nilqah…the catching away

Add yours

  1. Hi,
    This article is very informative! Thank you!
    I do want to point out that, imho, there’s some error in it, though…
    It was a snatching “away” and the “marriage ceremony” IS EASILY understood to be decribed as “lighting,” as it’s the joining of the two hearts, where the reaction from the Sacred Heart illuminates that of the Immaculate Heart!
    Then, then the realm/dimensional separation (or tent, as used in the OT) of the two who married (Also, as described by Hebrew Patriarchs of two men and “taking” the wife).
    Then, almost as if it was just a very elaborately detailed dream that was also able to show scenes involving their past and future, even though the bride/Church herself hadn’t been alive for or hadn’t ever experienced these actual (some VERY OLD) memories, or truly knew anything about ANY of this stuff because they hadn’t even been to church in 20 years! Even then, that was v. Sporadic and she’d certainly been unlearned of any of these supposed events, nor had so much as even HEARD OF THEM PRIOR TO IT:
    Then, the apparently new BRIDE – well. WIFE now, was instantly back here!
    On Earth wondering, since obviously the clearly sane (or we w/o any history of delusion/hallucinations nor any psychological issues over their entire lives are kind of freaking out at what the hell just happened to them.
    Their quest to understand that, and what these things had meant leads me to you.
    This event occurred to me in the summer of 2015. Nothing like it happened before or since.

    You might want to read The Mystery Of Edwin Drood (although the ending is off bc Dicken’s died before it was finished), to better understand the Church (the “members” in the Novel? Those names are symbolic to the Abrahamic faiths and in a few cases actual surnames).
    Also, I’m the opening scene, the Tower? It’s word play and also a surname.
    That surname for a long time used to be Mag Dal, though.
    Magdalene.

    It’s already happened.

    Like

  2. Yes.

    If the incident had not happened to me personally, someone educated, no reason to lie, completely sane and free from any sort of “delusion/psychological” issue before or since then, I truly doubt that would believe someone telling me this, either!
    Tbh, I just truly expect people not to! I still do meekly speak my truth, even if it does sounds so far-fetched that I hardly do mention this to anyone because I KNOW what they’ll think. Because I’d likely assume that too, if I were them!

    The “official” Christian Church DOES KNOW, btw.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: